Why not to have a look on the report rather a blind guess here?
It comes from the report of 2007 Face of Global Sex published by the Durex Network. The survey was conducted via durex.com website during the period of August and September 2006 on 26,082 people in 26 countries. Among those being interviewed there are 1100 candidates from Hong Kong. The figure has been analyzed by sex and age to give an in-depth and global picture of sexual attitude and behavior.
The figure of first time sex (HK) is around 20.2 in general. It would give us more comprehensive idea if we can have the figure broken down by age group. According to the similar survey conducted by Durex in 2005, young people continue to have sex at an earlier age than previous generations: while the 25-34s lost their virginity at 17.9, the 21-24 year olds were 17.5 and 16-20 year olds were just 16.3. The breakdown helps explain the news posted by 新鮮previously. For details please refer to the 2005 Survey report for your information.
若果你是著眼於年青人,但還不停打鬥於20.2這粒數,哈哈,風子袛可說是生果日報既禍害人不淺,它誤導了你!你要看應該看的數據如下, - young people continue to have sex at an earlier age than previous generations: 1) 25-34s lost their virginity at 17.9, 2) 21-24 year olds were 17.5 3) 16-20 year olds were just 16.3 咁就較貼近你心中的數字,又跟早前的新聞報導吻合!
38 則留言:
簡直係講大話唔眨眼, 好離譜囉!!
寧靜,
嗰份報告可信情度極低,
信嗰個都儍架! :p
我又不覺得很好笑，也不一定是錯的，很視乎調查所選的spectrum/segment如何，只可說有關的spectrum/segment的代表性不足吧。
為什麼我會選spectrum這何字的呢？我傻左，sorly sorly！
二十？十二都有啦...
carrie,
好明顯喺有問題啦,
咁嘅報告有做等如無做,
放出來都得啖笑,
毫無意義!
伊麵丹,
都喺你哋啲後生仔明白事實嘅真相! :p
噢... 咁我應該要好自悲了...
調查只銜蓋有能力有辧法購買到該商品的消費者，忽略了小學到初中的被訪者(例如早前於家中玩5P的中二生)。所以欠缺代表性。
程霜,
我們不知道這次調查背後的動機,
亦不知它抽樣的範圍和方法,
但看來這個報告並不能反映事實嘅真相了!
oscar,
你不用這樣想,
早失身並不代表什麼,
只代表身體早熟,
但思想仍然十分幼稚!
不是什麼都愈快愈好的!
死嘞，我初頭睇呢段報導都冇乜反應，睇左呢度先至醒番，真遲鈍嘞！
下,唔信,
去下日本問下就知幾多年齡都有.
小豬,
如果個標題喺"
年青人12歲前失身"
咁你可能會即時有反應喎! :p
wutkwo00,
唔洗問人哋吖,
問吓香港啲年青人就知喇!
個調查係邊度做架？係老師面前問學生呀？
十六歲都俾多啦！
mm...我又唔覺得好出奇喎.....
我身邊d朋友都唔會在20歲前嚐禁果喎.....
keke,我哋純情呢, hohohoho
by the way, 報導有無講受訪的年齡層?
受訪的人係時下年青人定還是.....???
coobe,
你講得好啱!
十四五歲就玩5p啦!
bbj,
講得好正,
可能真喺老師問學生呀!
XDDDDD
lala,
我們那個時代同而家啲"小朋友"分別己經好大了,
可能哩份問題喺在老人院問的,
啲公公婆婆咁筨己經好大膽囉! :p
Why not to have a look on the report rather a blind guess here?
It comes from the report of 2007 Face of Global Sex published by the Durex Network. The survey was conducted via durex.com website during the period of August and September 2006 on 26,082 people in 26 countries. Among those being interviewed there are 1100 candidates from Hong Kong. The figure has been analyzed by sex and age to give an in-depth and global picture of sexual attitude and behavior.
The figure of first time sex (HK) is around 20.2 in general. It would give us more comprehensive idea if we can have the figure broken down by age group. According to the similar survey conducted by Durex in 2005, young people continue to have sex at an earlier age than previous generations: while the 25-34s lost their virginity at 17.9, the 21-24 year olds were 17.5 and 16-20 year olds were just 16.3. The breakdown helps explain the news posted by 新鮮previously. For details please refer to the 2005 Survey report for your information.
http://www.durex.com/uk/files/2005_GGS%20Report_final.pdf
We are now on aging population structure. So??? The figure of 20.2 is still reasonable as a whole then. XD
btw, don’t be misled 20歲重算唔算係年青人???
18=< teenage (青少年)
18 – 24 都算係 youth
25-34 –應該係 young adult 哦, 重年青咩 =_=”
果粒數係整體而非年青人
結論:生果日報誤導讀者，而被誤導既新鮮係自己既blog提出質疑，再而誤導其他訪客讀者 XDDD !
我14歲失身架~~
新鮮人你幾多歲初夜呀?wahahahha~
我睇報紙佢地敍述香港人失身年齡"落後"於其他國家。遲失身就等於保守同羞家嗎？
風子,
無論份問卷是如何安排同處理,
我們都留意答卷所講嘅是不是事實嘅真相,
東方人一向對性比較保守,
而在的年青人就是失身亦不代表會對人講實話,
如果有個細路十四歲就失身,
你估佢敢唔敢照實答呢,
所以我一向對這些所謂調查都抱有懷疑的想法,
因為無論份問題有幾精密都好,
人為因數都要有很大的影響,
我當然没有看哂整份報告,
但就失身年齡這點,
我打死都唔會信架!
yanyan,
哈哈~~~
遲你幾年啦!:p
翔,
我諗只是用詞問題啫,
應該無貶意嘅!
哈哈,要打死先信呀，咁你企穩哦 XD
其實你提及的疑慮都是social survey既通病，記唔記得以前政府某個survey，想了解香港人在內地包二奶既情況，唔駛唸１０個男人１０個都唔會認，所以政府採納統計學的概率於survey中，以隨機抽波的方式去決定受訪問者要答了那些問題，過程完全保密，繼而將所得之結果分析推論！
誠然，任何的調查都存在偏差，但在沒有任何資料前或袛可靠亂猜，調查既結論都尚算是一科學的方案可作參考，那當然成本與效益相掛，要多準確？除了採納更科學的方案外，也要件＄＄＄才能成事！
OnlineSurvey乃一最便宜又QuickReponse既方法，其可信性較其他方法低，但若沒有那
２０．２既數據面世，你又點可以咁大聲話佢唔準呢？哈哈哈．．．．
風子,
我想信個報告容重有好多嘢,
但就20.2歲這個問題我真喺好存疑,
如果我話而家啲十幾廿歲嘅後生仔好有道德觀念,
唔結婚唔性交,
就算有咁會過20歲,
20歲前大部份喺無性經驗嘅,
你信唔信吖?
訧連上我個blog嗰幾個後生仔都話無可能啊!
你話偏差唔大咩?
唉,都話左你俾生果日報誤導啦, 果粒數係計香港整體人口(allagegroup)而非祗是針對年青人(25或以下的agegroup)!
你可以咁唸,20.2係整體平均數,受害者包括你啦新鮮媽啦,你隔離屋個阿叔以及讀緊中學既小明!再簡單點你可試計算你自己跟新鮮媽,咁果粒數就會makesense既啦!
若果你是著眼於年青人,但還不停打鬥於20.2這粒數,哈哈,風子袛可說是生果日報既禍害人不淺,它誤導了你!你要看應該看的數據如下,
- young people continue to have sex at an earlier age than previous generations:
1) 25-34s lost their virginity at 17.9,
2) 21-24 year olds were 17.5
3) 16-20 year olds were just 16.3
咁就較貼近你心中的數字,又跟早前的新聞報導吻合!
風子,
但喺個數據喺個報告(20.2)出喎,
唔喺生果出喎!
係, 20.2粒數係報告出既,但佢既報告講既20.2係整體,而生果斷章將20.2=年青人!這明碼叫做斷章誤導,是新聞從業者未夠班,在轉述第三者報告時,報導錯誤!係香港本地新聞屢見不鮮,這回你是受害者! :(
風子,
咁又唔可以講"受害"嘅,
而家好多報紙都喺咁,
有斷章取義的習慣,
分別只是動機不同,
所以大家都唔好信哂囉! :p
哈哈, 所以對報紙報導常抱懷疑態度是對的,尢其係生果同方向這類報章雜誌 :)
風子,
同意啊! :p
發佈留言