昨天落馬洲那宗六死車禍讓人極之痛心，
臨近新年才痛失親人是何等悲衰?
那名醉酒駕駛的貨櫃車司機必需判以重刑，
給那些不顧別人死活的酒鬼來個殺雞警猴。
香港不少人以為飲少少不是一回事，
尤其是節日前後，
一些好飲兩杯的人就視法例如無物，
酒照飲，車照駛，
自己死自己事，
但傷及無辜實在罪無可恕，
一定要嚴格執行有關法例。
現在醉酒導致他人死亡都只是十年監禁而已，
我覺得應該是一條命十年，
今次六條命就要六十年，
治亂世，用重典!
我不喜歡飲酒，
我承認我對飲酒的人有偏見，
尤其是那些愛飲到爛醉如泥的人，
酒後胡言亂語兼嘔吐大作，
又要麻煩別人摻扶料理，
如何酒後還去揸車就更加不知所謂，
累人累物，罪無可恕，
一定要嚴加重罰，
最好判他做死者家人的家奴，
讓他好好後悔一生!
15 則留言:
做家奴?
6個家庭的家奴???
135, 246 都唔夠wu~~~
無用嘅！ 法例寫到明最重都是罰小小款，坐極短期監禁，和停牌短期咋，唔使死嘅，冇一樣是重典。
法官判到盡都度係咁多，佢無能為力。
改法例需時，又冇追索權，這個醉酒司機不適用。
除非用私刑喇！
放心好了, 難得市民今鑊贊成加重刑罰, 濫權嘅龜同政府仲唔慌趕住做~
悟樂,
積係做一世囉,
哈哈哈~~~
space,
其實只要啲法官重手嘅都ok啦,
車死人十年都唔算輕了!
不過我唔清楚危險駕駛嘅最高刑罰是怎樣喎!
巔兄,
我見到政府08年中已經加重了刑罰,
又唔可以講政府唔多嘢嘅,
最重要係市民自己要守法,
電視廣告都成日播"醉酒駕駛,累己累人",
啲酒鬼係要付上最大嘅責任!
08年中那通過的條例並不是什麼重刑罰,祗是在現行的制度下再給予警方較大的權力,可以有權在路上隨機抽樣,要求司機做酒精呼器測試,若果測試樣本略略高出標準者,再不如以往般有口頭警告字句,取而代之的是檢控!雖然刑責上並沒大分別,但嚴謹點的條例的確可以起阻嚇之效! 我還是那一句 "don't drive if you drink" 顧己及人!
風子,
現在"危險駕駛導致他人死亡"最高刑罰不是十年嗎?
不過啲官判幾多又是一個問題,
我認為一定要重罰,
因為成日都見到這些新聞,
不收阻嚇判罰不可呀!
不過最重要係駕駛者自律,
否則再高都無補於事了!
新鮮人: Tougher Canadian laws against drivers impaired due to drugs and alcohol
(effective July 2 2008):
* face a maximum life sentence if they cause death when their blood alcohol concentration is over 80
* face a maximum 10-year sentence if they cause bodily harm when their blood alcohol concentration is over 80
* face a mandatory penalty of $1000 for a first offence
* face a sentence of 30 days in jail for a second offence
* face a sentence of 120 days in jail for a third offence
* face a higher maximum penalty on summary conviction of 18 months, compared to 6 months previously. The five-year maximum when the prosecution proceeds by indictment stays the same.
* Drivers suspected of impaired driving can now be charged with a criminal offence if they refuse a request for a roadside sobriety test.
* Police will also have the right to take a driver suspected of impaired driving to a hospital or police station to provide blood, urine or saliva samples.
I think repeated offenders are just like loaded guns, eventually they will kill or injure someone !!!
(Ref: http://canadaonline.about.com/od/canadianlaw/a/dui.htm)
微豆,
謝謝你的資料,
其實加拿大的法例都好嚴格,
但不知法官在判案時會重手還是輕手呢?
雖然最高刑罰好重,
但有時法官判得輕,
收不到阻嚇作用啊!
At our side, drink driving legislation was first introduced in Hong Kong in December 1995, filing in Section 39 of the Road Traffic Ordinance (RTO), and the prescribed alcohol concentration limit was tightened in October 1999 subsequently to reinforce the message of road safety as follows,
a)22 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of breath;
b)50 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood; and
c)67 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of urine.
The number of drivers who had consumed alcohol and were involved in traffic accidents was decreased steadily since the legislation implemented. The risk of drink driving, however, is still significantly higher than the case when accidents of all types are considered. According to Hong Kong Police Force, on average one in four drink driving-related traffic accidents resulted in someone being killed or seriously injured in between 2003 and 2007 while only one in six being reported as a whole. Recently, the Road Traffic Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2008 has passed in June 2008 which translates an enhancement of penalty for drink driving prosecution. Under the new legislation, Hong Kong Police Force is empowered to conduct random breath tests and where any driver with alcohol in his body exceeding the prescribed limit will be prosecuted. And again, don’t drink if you drive ~
新鮮人: In general, impaired drivers who have past convictions and are prosecuted for traffic death(s) will usually be sent to jail. Max sentences are applied to the worst cases. So, it all depends on a driver's past record.
Hyacinthus: Thank you for the info. You are right: "Don't drink if you drive" is the best preventive approach.
呢件事我之前都有睇到新聞, 會覺得就算好似古代咁一命換一命都便宜左個司機囉, 佢換左6條!!
微豆,
醉酒駕駛傷人係嚴重嘅罪行,
就算無前科都要重罰,
因為危害到別人的安全,
如果係醉酒駕駛導致他人死亡就要極刑,
就算無前科都係咁話,
因為人命尤關啊!!!
否則不可以收到阻嚇的作用!
蛋散,
我同意你的看法,
人命尤關,
就是一條生命都要重視,
何況是六條,
一定要"殺雞警猴"!
發佈留言